WALKER

v.

ENDELL, DIRECTOR OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Industrion, Inc. v. Hialeah Indus., Inc., 593 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …l of the settlement, we find that there was no abuse of discretion and, therefore, affirm. See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F. 2d 1142, 1158 (5th Cir.) (court order approving settlement reviewed under abuse of discretion standard), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 311, 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988). In addition, we find that the other issues on appeal were not properly raised at the trial level and are, therefore, precluded from being raised now. See Hegeman-Harris Co. v. All State Pipe Supply Co., 400 S…
• LA Preferida, Inc. v. Cerveceria Modelo, 914 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …Hines v. British Steel Corp., 907 F. 2d 726, 728-29 (7th Cir.1990). Summary judgment should not be granted if the evidence supports alternate inferences. Id.; see LHLC Corp. v. Gluett, Peabody & Co., 842 F. 2d 928, 935-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 311, 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988). B. The 1986 Case In order to withstand Modelo’s motion for summary judgment in the 1986 case, La Preferida was required to demonstrate that there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could find that Mod…
• Int'l Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …efeat the motion by demonstrating that the evidence tendered by the mov [*1264] ing party is itself laced with contradictions of fact. Isquith for and on behalf of Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F. 2d 186, 198 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 310, 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988). Of course, the court need only concern itself with contradictions of salient facts; factual disputes over issues not germane to the claim are simply irrelevant because they are not outcome determinative. The…