MIDDLE SOUTH UTILITIES, INC., ET AL.

v.

ISQUITH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pope v. MCI Telecomms. Corp., 937 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …ra, note 3. . See supra, note 4. . 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (1988). . See supra, note 4. . Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Inv. Corp., 660 F. 2d 594, 597 (5th Cir.1981). . Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Lockheed Corp., 844 F. 2d 1142, 1158 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 311, 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988); Carter v. Procunier, 755 F. 2d 1126, 1129 (5th Cir.1985). Cf. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 230, 9 L.Ed.2d 222, 225-26, (1962) (Leave may be denied for "delay, bad faith ..., repeated failur…
• Krim v. Banctexas Grp., Inc., 989 F.2d 1435 (5th Cir. 1993)
  …would consider significant in the decision whether to invest,/'such that it alters the “total mix” of information available about the proposed inv/estment. See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F. 2d 186, 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 310, 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988). Issuers are absolutely liable for material misstatements or omissions made under § 11 of the 1933 Act. Wielgos v. Com [*1446] monwealth Edison Co., 892 F. 2d 509, 513 (7th Cir.1989). Plaintiff has not come…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harvey M. Jasper Ret. Tr. v. Ivax Corp., 920 F. Supp. 1260 (S.D. Fla. 1995)