FAIRCHILDE

v.

EARNST ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Errol MacDONALD, 916 F.2d 766 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …appropriate standards of review. A district court’s determination as to whether exigent circumstances existed is fact-specific, and will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. United States v. Cattouse, 846 F. 2d 144, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 929, 109 S.Ct. 316, 102 L.Ed.2d 335 (1988); see Minnesota v. Olson, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1684, 1690, 109 L.Ed.2d 85 (1990) (showing deference to the state court’s “fact-specific” finding of exigent circumstances). Moreover, the test for determining whet…
• United States v. Lopez, 937 F.2d 716 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …that the suspect is in the premises being entered”; (5) “a likelihood that the suspect will escape if not swiftly apprehended”; and (6) the peaceful circumstances of the entry. United States v. Cattouse, 846 F. 2d 144, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 929, 109 S.Ct. 316, 102 L.Ed.2d 335 (1988) (citations omitted). In determining that exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrant-less entry in this case, the district court concluded: The totality of the circumstances confronting the arresting…
• United States v. Medina, 944 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1991)
  ….2d 639 (1980); United States v. MacDonald, 916 F. 2d 766, 769 (2d Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1071, 112 L.Ed.2d 1177 (1991); Zabare, 871 F. 2d at 289; United States v. Cattouse, 846 F. 2d 144, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 929, 109 S.Ct. 316, 102 L.Ed.2d 335 (1988). A district court’s finding that exigent circumstances existed justifying such a warrantless entry will not be overturned unless it is “clearly erroneous.” MacDonald, 916 F. 2d at 769; Cattouse, 846 F. 2d at…