ANDERSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• United States v. Frank Church, 955 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …407, 2413, 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985). See also United States v. Oberski, 734 F. 2d 1030, 1032 (5th Cir.1984) (defining these statutory terms “according to their ordinary meanings”). In United States v. Apodaca, 843 F. 2d 421 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932, 109 S.Ct. 325, 102 L.Ed.2d 342 (1988), the Tenth Circuit examined the statutory definition, noting the significance of the fact that the statute is phrased in the disjunctive: The government can prove a defendant’s role as an organizer or a supervi…
• United States v. Augustin Gonzalez, 71 F.3d 819 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …rial within a trial” that Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) seeks to avoid, as extrinsic evidence is ordinarily not admissible for the sole purpose of impeaching a witness’ credibility. See United States v. Schardar, 850 F. 2d 1457, 1462 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932, 109 S.Ct. 326, 102 L.Ed.2d 343 (1988). Rather, such extrinsic evidence is admissible under Rule 608(b) only when it tends to “ ‘contradict[ ] the material testimony of a prior witness,’ ” United States v. Calle, supra, 822 F. 2d at 1021 (quoting…
• United States v. Shmuel David, 940 F.2d 722 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …determining whether David organized, supervised or managed a criminal enterprise and its asso- [*731] eiates, we are to give the operative terms their ordinary meanings. See United States v. Apodaca, 843 F. 2d 421, 425-26 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932, 109 S.Ct. 325, 102 L.Ed.2d 342 (1988). To constitute a CCE, no formal structure or elaborate organizational chart need be in existence. See United States v. Gonzales, 866 F. 2d 781, 784 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1093, 109 S.Ct. 2438, 104…