KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO. ET AL.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488 (U.S. 1989)
  …onviction had expired, because it had been used to enhance the sentences imposed in 1978 for his 1976 state convictions, which he had yet to serve. Id., at 618-619. We granted certiorari to review this interpretation of the “in custody” requirement. 488 U. S. 941 (1988). We conclude that respondent is not presently “in custody” under the 1958 sentence, but that he is “in custody” under the 1978 state sentences which he has not yet begun to serve. The federal habeas statute gives the United States district…
• United States v. Monsanto, 491 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1989)
  …ect under the Due Process Clause for its failure to include a statutory provision requiring the sort of hearing that the panel had ordered in the first place. The four dissenting judges would have upheld the restraining order. We granted certiorari, 488 U. S. 941 (1988), because the Second Circuit’s decision created a conflict among the Courts of Appeals over the statutory and constitutional questions presented.6 We now reverse. II We first must address the question whether § 853 requires, upon conviction,…
• United States v. McKINES, 933 F.2d 1412 (8th Cir. 1991)
  …ates v. Archer, 840 F. 2d 567, 571 (8th Cir.) (“[W]e apply the clearly erroneous standard to review the district court’s determinations, made in the context of a motion to suppress, as to whether a fourth amendment seizure occurred.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941, 109 S.Ct. 364, 365, 102 L.Ed.2d 354 (1988); United States v. Hendrix, 726 F. 2d 433, 434 (8th Cir.1984) (district court’s finding that no seizure occurred not clearly erroneous). On the other hand, several of our cases can be read to hold that we…

  ← 1 / 2 →