MCCARTHY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1989)
  …sed, concluding that the arbitration agreement is enforceable because this Court’s subsequent decisions have reduced Wilko to “obsolescence.” Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/Lehman Bros., Inc., 845 F. 2d 1296, 1299 (CA5 1988). We granted certiorari, 488 U. S. 954 (1988). II The Wilko case, decided in 1953, required the Court to determine whether an agreement to arbitrate future controversies constitutes a binding stipulation “to waive compliance with any provision” of the Securities Act, which is nullified…
• McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 496 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1990)
  …[its] customers.” Ibid. After petitioner’s request for rehearing was denied, petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this Court, presenting the question whether federal law entitles it to a partial tax refund. We granted the petition, 488 U. S. 954 (1988), and consolidated the case with American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Smith, No. 88-325, which we also decide today.6 Post, p. 167. II Respondents first ask us to hold that, though the Florida courts accepted jurisdiction over this suit which s…
• Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Smith, 496 U.S. 167 (U.S. 1990)
  …to refunds for taxes paid before we decided Scheiner for the tax year that began after the Scheiner decision or to refunds for taxes paid after the Scheiner decision but before Justice Blackmun’s escrow order. We granted the petition for certiorari, 488 U. S. 954 (1988), and consolidated the case with No. 88-192, McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Dept. of Business Regulation of Fla., which we also decide today. See ante, p. 18. We now affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand f…