PERRY

v.

HOWES, WARDEN, FLORENCE CRANE WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

Citator

Cited By

• Wilson v. State BAR OF Ga., 132 F.3d 1422 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …es Dep’t of Labor, 954 F. 2d 634, 643 (11th Cir.1992) (per curiam). We are mindful that “[t]he particular context in which a regulation is promulgated ... is all important.” Howell v. State Bar of Tex., 843 F. 2d 205, 208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982, 109 S.Ct. 531, 102 L.Ed.2d 563 (1988). Consequently, if lawyers or former lawyers of reasonable intelligence can derive a core meaning from the amendments, then the amendments “may validly be applied to conduct within that meaning and the possibil…
• United States v. Contreras, 950 F.2d 232 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …eement, “the evidence must show beyond a reasonable doubt that two or more non-govem-mental persons agreed to commit the alleged offense.” United States v. Goff, 847 F. 2d 149, 173 (5th Cir.) (citation omitted) [*239] (emphasis added), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982, 109 S.Ct. 324, 102 L.Ed.2d 341 (1988). Indeed, “[a] government agent or informer cannot be a co-conspirator" because that person does not “share the unlawful objective of those engaged in the unlawful enterprise.” Id. at 173 & n. 37. Contreras argu…
• United States v. McCRORY, 930 F.2d 63 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
  …nited States v. Glover, 846 F. 2d 339, 343 (6th Cir.) (government failure to disclose evidence as required by reciprocal discovery order is not reversible error where it only [*70] limits the cross-examination of a government witness), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982, 109 S.Ct. 533, 102 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); United States v. Brodie, 871 F. 2d 125, 129 (D.C.Cir.1989) (government failure to provide defendant with printed transcript of tape of secretly recorded conversation is not reversible error absent specific req…