REARDON ET AL.

v.

MILLER, JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, CHANCERY DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Lamon, 930 F.2d 1183 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …e harbored an objectively reasonable belief in the existence of probable cause.13 The Leon limitation on the exclusionary rule was applied to a situation similar to this case in United States v. Anderson, 851 F. 2d 727 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1031, 109 S.Ct. 841, 102 L.Ed.2d 973 (1989). The defendant in Anderson allegedly had offered to sell informants a pistol that, he bragged, had been used to kill someone. Id. at 728. However, the affidavit in support of the search warrant issued in the ca…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) & Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433), 928 F.2d 1450 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …71, 83 L.Ed.2d 975 (1985). Thus any argument relating to credibility of the govern [*1458] ment’s witnesses is irrelevant to our determination of the sufficiency of the evidence. See United States v. Rios, 842 F. 2d 868 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1031, 109 S.Ct. 840, 102 L.Ed.2d 972 (1989). Defendants next argue that they each were denied effective assistance of counsel. However, neither defendant made this claim to the district court. This court will not review an ineffective assistance of coun…
• United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), 942 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …estimony regarding the hearsay statement. As previously discussed, we apply the abuse of discretion standard to the district court’s evidentiary determinations. See United States v. Rios, 842 F. 2d 868, 874 (6th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1031, 109 S.Ct. 840, 102 L.Ed.2d 972 (1989). “However, a district court’s conclusions of law, such as whether proffered evidence constitutes hearsay within the meaning of the Federal Rules of Evidence, are reviewed de novo.” United States v. Levy, 904 F.…