MCCONICO

v.

ROBINSON

Citator

Cited By

• Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858 (U.S. 1989)
  …986); United States v. Bezold, 760 F. 2d 999 (CA9 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1063 (1986). See also United States v. Rodriguez-Suarez, 856 F. 2d 135 (CA11 1988) (because no assertion of prejudice, declines to reach merits of claim), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 1045 (1989). In other opinions Courts of Appeals have rejected challenges to a magistrate’s presiding over jury selection on procedural grounds. United States v. Rivera-Sola, 713 F. 2d 866 (CA1 1983) (defendant failed to object, no plain error); United S…
• United States v. Smith, 918 F.2d 1551 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …ates v. Rodriguez-Suarez, 856 F. 2d 135, 139 (11th Cir.1988) (“Prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument does not require reversal unless the comments are both improper and prejudicial to a substantial right of the defendant.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1045, 109 S.Ct. 875, 102 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989). We review allegedly improper comments by the prosecutor on the particular facts of the case and in the context of the entire record. Obregon, 893 F. 2d at 1310. Because statements and arguments of counsel are…
• United States v. Jacoby, 955 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …a prosecutor’s statements during closing argument require reversal only if “the comments are both improper and prejudicial to a substantial right of the defendant,” United States v. Rodriquez-Suarez, 856 F. 2d 135, 139 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1045, 109 S.Ct. 875, 102 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989); Obregon, 893 F. 2d at 1310, and we review such alleged misconduct in light of the “particular facts of the case and in the context of the entire record.” Smith, 918 F. 2d at 1562. We have also held that beca…