FRANCIS J. HIGGINS

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Lucious Stringer v. State, 246 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
  …osecuting officials were aware of the falsity of the alleged perjured testimony) and such allegations must be supported by sufficient documentary evidence or affidavits to this effect. Conyers v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 616, cert. den. Fla., 222 So. 2d 749; Gammage v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So. 2d 529. See also Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So. 2d 730; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So. 2d 335; Hall v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So. 2d 324; Gilliard v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d 902; Buch…
• Mattox v. State, 590 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …otion, he therefore was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing based simply upon his allegation that the state knowingly obtained his conviction based upon insufficient evidence. See Conyers v. State, 215 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So. 2d 749 (Fla.1969). 563 So. 2d at 793. We then affirmed the summary denial of his motion “without prejudicing his opportunity to demonstrate that he has exhausted all efforts to obtain a copy of the December 11, 1981 evidence report.” Id. at 794. Mattox t…
• Mattox v. State, 563 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …otion, he therefore was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing based simply upon his allegation that the state knowingly obtained his conviction based upon insufficient evidence. See Conyers v. State, 215 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So. 2d 749 (Fla.1969). Finally, Mattox contends that the trial court relied upon improper considerations when it sentenced him under the habitual offender statute. However, the reasons Mattox quotes were provided by the court as justification for retaining ju…

Authorities Cited

• Victor Emanuel Gaultiere et ux. v. Cocoa Masonry, Inc., 213 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)