SMITH ET AL.

v.

STONEKING

Citator

Cited By

• Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1995)
  …bsequently indicated that Croson had at least some bearing on federal race-based action [*223] when it vacated a decision upholding such action and remanded for further consideration in light of Croson. H. K. Porter Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 489 U. S. 1062 (1989); see also Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford, Inc. v. FCC, 876 F. 2d 902, 915, n. 16 (CADC 1989) (opinion of Silber-man, J.) (noting the Court’s action in H. K. Porter Co.), rev’d sub nom. Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U. S. 547 (1990)…
• D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Tech. Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …ulsorily in school. The only cases in this court presenting the issue of the application of a duty of care to school children are Stoneking v. Bradford Area Sch. Dist., 856 F. 2d 594 (3d Cir.1988) (Stoneking I), vacated sub nom. Smith v. Stoneking, 489 U.S. 1062, 109. S.Ct. 1333, 103 L.Ed.2d 804 (1989), and Stoneking II, 882 F. 2d 720 (3d Cir.1989). It is clear from reading Stoneking II that this court did not hold that DeShaney precluded the application of a special relationship between the state entity an…
• S.J. Groves & Sons Co. & Jasper Constr. Co. v. Fulton Cnty., 920 F.2d 752 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …been caused primarily by extensive discovery and by the district court's prudent request for additional briefing on the effect of the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in H.K. Porter Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 825 F. 2d 324 (11th Cir.1987), vacated, 489 U.S. 1062, 109 S.Ct. 1333, 103 L.Ed.2d 804 (1989), on this case. The district court decided Porter did not affect its disposition of the issues in this case. See District Court Order, Apr. 22, 1988, R. 3-188-6. The Supreme Court subsequently vacated our opini…

  ← 1 / 2 →