SPALLONE

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; CHEMA V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND LONGO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1990)
  …and Hudson. 840 F. 2d, at 810-814. This Court granted certiorari to resolve the conflict — so evident in the divided views of the judges of the Eleventh Circuit — that has arisen in the Courts of Appeals over the proper scope of the Parratt rule.2 489 U. S. 1064 (1989). [*117] Because this case concerns the propriety of a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, the question before us is a narrow one. We decide only whether the Parratt rule necessarily means that Burch’s complaint fails to allege any deprivation of due pro…
• Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (U.S. 1990)
  …tate proved by “clear, cogent, and convincing” evidence that the administration of antipsychotic medication was both necessary and effective for furthering a compelling state interest.5 Id., at 883-884, 759 P. 2d, at 364-365. We granted certiorari, 489 U. S. 1064 (1989), and we reverse. II Respondent contends that because the State has ceased administering antipsychotic drugs to him against his will, the case is moot. We disagree. Even if we confine our attention to those facts found in the record,6 a liv…
• In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177 (U.S. 1991)
  …(1988); Sindram v. Taylor, No. 88-5386, cert. denied, 488 U. S. 911, rehearing denied, 488 U. S. 987 (1988); Sindram v. Maryland, No. 89-5039, cert. denied, 493 U. S. 857 (1989); In re Sindram, No. 88-6538, petition for writ of habeas corpus denied, 489 U. S. 1064 (1989); Sindram v. Ahalt, No. 89-6755, cert. denied, 494 U. S. 1086 (1990); Sindram v. District of Columbia, No. 89-7266, cert. denied, 496 U. S. 940, rehearing denied, 497 U. S. 1047 (1990); Sindram v. N. Richard Kimmel Prop., No. 89-7847, cert. d…