SOLOMON

v.

UNITED STATES; AND SOLOMON V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Behety, 32 F.3d 503 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …rovisions. We review this asserted error under the plain error standard as neither of the appellants objected to this instruction or requested supplemental instructions. United States v. Solomon, 856 F. 2d 1572, 1575 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1070, 109 S.Ct. 1352, 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989). Jury instructions will be reversed for plain error only if, “ ‘the charge, considered as a whole, is so clearly erroneous as to result in a likelihood of a grave miscarriage of justice,’ or the error ‘seriou…
• United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …, 656 (2d Cir.1989); 2) determines that the evidence is relevant under Fed.R.Evid. 401 & 402, and is more probative than unfairly prejudicial under Fed.R.Evid. 403, id. (quoting United States v. Ortiz, 857 F. 2d 900, 903 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1070, 109 S.Ct. 1352, 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989)); and 3) provides an appropriate lim [*1329] iting instruction to the jury, if one is requested, id. (citing Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681, 691-92, 108 S.Ct. 1496, 1502, 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988), and…
• United States v. Lasanta, 978 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …, 1006 (2d Cir.1984)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1022, 109 S.Ct. 1750, 104 L.Ed.2d 187 (1989) (emphasis added). See also United States v. Ortiz, 857 F. 2d 900, 903 (2d Cir.1988) (noting that inclusionary approach governs in this circuit), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1070, 109 S.Ct. 1352, 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989); United States v. Levy, 731 F. 2d 997, 1002 (2d Cir.1984) (citing United States v. O’Connor, 580 F. 2d 38, 40 (2d Cir.1978)) (same). Our decisions specifically approve the use of evidence of a defendant’s pri…