AULT
v.
HUSTLER MAGAZINE, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1989-03-20
No. 88-1215
489 U.S. 1080 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Larez v. City OF LOS Angeles, 946 F.2d 630 (9th Cir. 1991)
    …damages. Second, while it may be true that Gates could not be held liable for emotional distress consistent with the first amendment for expression of his opinions qua opinions, see Ault v. Hustler, 860 F. 2d 877, 880 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1080, 109 S.Ct. 1532, 103 L.Ed.2d 837 (1989), defendants’ implied assertion that the first amendment prohibits using the statements against Gates in any manner is absurd. Where the principal allegations in this case include among them that Gates set a to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw