COPELAND
v.
LOUISIANA; EARVIN V. LYNAUGH, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BARBER V. TEXAS; MATTHEWS V. SOUTH CAROLINA; JENNINGS V. CALIFORNIA; JOHNSON V. TENNESSEE; BELL V. TENNESSEE; WOOMER V. AIKEN, WARDEN, ET AL.; MOORE V. ZANT, WARDEN; HOLLAND V. TEXAS; STEVENS V. NEVADA

U.S. | 1989-03-20
Nos. 88-5961; No. 88-6148; No. 88-6150; No. 88-6203; No. 88-6350; No. 88-6361; No. 88-6365; No. 88-6393; No. 88-6424; No. 88-6530; No. 88-6655
489 U.S. 1091 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1992)
    …455 U. S. 927 (1982); State v. Aumann, 265 N. W. 2d 316, 319-320 (Iowa 1978); State v. Chapman, 104 N. M. 324, 327-328, 721 P. 2d 392, 395-396 [*448] (1986); Barber v. State, 757 S. W. 2d 359, 362-363 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 489 U. S. 1091 (1989). Still other state courts have said that the burden rests with the prosecution. E, g., Diaz v. State, 508 A. 2d 861, 863-864 (Del. 1986); Commonwealth v. Crowley, 393 Mass. 393, 400-401, 471 N. E. 2d 353, 357-358 (1984); State v. Bertrand,…
  • United States v. Cates, 952 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1992)
    …ot raise the Rule 35 contention before the district court in his § 2255 motion. We will not consider for the first time on appeal an argument not presented to the district court. Earvin v. Lynaugh, 860 F. 2d 623, 627-28 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1091, 109 S.Ct. 1558, 103 L.Ed.2d 861 (1989); United States v. Houston, 745 F. 2d 333, 334 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1008, 105 S.Ct. 1369, 84 L.Ed.2d 388 (1985); Hall v. Maggio, 697 F. 2d 641, 643 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. McKnight, 6…
  • Carzell Moore v. Zant, 972 F.2d 318 (11th Cir. 1992)
    …ourt denied Moore a certificate of probable cause to appeal its rejection of his Brady and Giglio claims. On June 29, 1988, we also denied a certificate of probable cause. The Supreme Court then denied certiorari on March 20, 1989. Moore v. Zant, 489 U.S. 1091, 109 S.Ct. 1560, 103 L.Ed 2d 863 (1989). Nothing more occurred in this case until the state sought to resentenee Moore on November 16, 1990, approximately one year and eight months after the last judicial activity. Moore responded by filing a moti…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw