TOMPKINS

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (69 total)

• Udick v. Harbor Hills Dev., L.P., 179 So. 3d 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
  …Mr. Udick correctly argues that, as a general rule, “[a] judg [*492] ment or decree among parties to a lawsuit resolves issues as among them, but it does not conclude the rights of strangers to those proceedings.” Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989), superseded, by statute (in civil rights context), Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1074, However, . these principles do not always require one to have been a party to a judgment in order to be bound…
• Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Naiel Nassar., 570 U.S. 338 (U.S. 2013)
  …tidiscrimination laws, H.R.Rep. No. 102-40, pt. II, pp. 2-4 (1991) (hereinafter House Report [*370] Part II) (citing, inter alia, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989) ; Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989) ; Lorance v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 490 U.S. 900, 109 S.Ct. 2261, 104 L.Ed.2d 961 (1989) ). Among the decisions found inadequately protective was Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d 268…
• Ensley Branch v. Seibels, 31 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …ty employees collaterally attacked the decrees and the affirmative action programs adopted under them. See In re Birmingham Reverse Discrimination Employment Litig., 833 F. 2d 1492, 1495 (11th Cir.1987), aff'd sub nom. Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989). The United States, despite its status as a signatory of the consent decrees, also brought suit against the City, lodging allegations similar to those of the individual plaintiffs. Id., 833 F. 2d at 1496; cf. In re Birming…

  ← 1 / 5 →