SAM WEISS
v.
J. M. LEE, AS STATE COMPTROLLER

Fla. | 1938-04-08
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
132 Fla. 56 Florida Supreme Court (1938) Caution
Also reported at: 180 So. 345
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court
Terrell, J.

Terrell, J.

The facts presented and the questions raised in this case are identical with those raised and urged, in DeLuxe Packing House, Inc., v. Lee, decided this date. The judgment below is accordingly reversed on authority of that case and what we said in Henry Borrego and Tom Borrego v. Lee, decided this date.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rosamond v. Mann, 80 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1955)
    …Theatres v. Brach, 118 Fla. 320, 159 So. 867; and Pillans & Smith Co. v. Lowe, 117 Fla. 249, 157 So. [*320] 649. Ultimately, however, this section was held unconstitutional, because not germane to the title of the original act, in McCord v. Connor, 132 Fla. 56, 180 So. 519, and the opinion in that case specifically declared Sec. 1 of the 1905 act to be in full force and effect. The constitutionality of the 1931 amendment to F.S.A. § 83.04, supra, is not raised, and we express no opinion concerning it. Th…
  • Waln v. Howard, 142 Fla. 736 (Fla. 1940)
    …s, a tenancy at will only, under Section 5431, C. G. L. 1927, which was Section Lof Chapter 5441, Acts of 1905. Defendant further contended at first that Chapter 15057, Acts of 1931, repealed Section 5431, supra; but in the case of McCord v. Connor, 132 Fla. 56, 180 So. 519, Section 1 of Chapter 15057, supra, purporting to change Section 1 of Section 5431, C. G. L. was held to be unconstitutional. Therefore, Section 1 of the original Act which appears in C. G. L. as Section 5431, is still in force. Defend…
  • Light v. Meginniss, 156 Fla. 61 (Fla. 1945)
    …3; Jerome H. Shiep & Co. v. Amos, 100 Fla. 863, 130 So. 699; Commercial Fishermen’s Association v. Christensen, 151 Fla. 454, 10 So. (2nd) 322; Spencer v. Hunt, 109 Fla. 248, 147 So. 282 Smith v. Chase, 91 Fla. 1044, 109 So. 24, or McCord v. Conner, 132 Fla. 56, 180 So. 519. On authority of the cases above cited and for the reasons hereinabove stated, the return of the respondent is held sufficient. The motion for peremptory writ of mandamus, the answer or return of the respondent to the contrary notwiths…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw