LOWRY ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CECIL ROMEO STILES ET AL., RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS; CECIL ROMEO STILES, PETITIONER, V. L. E. MYERS COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied petitions for writ of certiorari and granted one petition for attorney's fees.
The court reviewed consolidated cases involving orders from the Florida Industrial Commission. Petitions and cross-petitions for certiorari were filed…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
In Lowry Electric Company, et al v. Stiles et al, Case No. 38,284, by petition *46and cross-petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review orders of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing dates of January 9, 1969 and January 14, 1969; and in Stiles v. L. E. Myers Company, et al., Case No. 28,289, by petition for certi-orari we have for review order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated January 9, 1969; which cases have been consolidated by this court.
Our consideration of the petitions for certiorari and cross-petition for certiorari, record and briefs, and oral argument having been heard, leads us to conclude that the petitions and cross-petition for certi-orari in both cases should be and they are hereby denied.
In the case of Stiles v. L. E. Myers Company, et al, Case No. 38,289, the petition for attorney’s fee is likewise denied.
In the case of Lowry Electric Company et al v. Stiles et al., Case No. 38,284, the petition for attorney’s fee filed by respondent is granted in the amount of $350.00.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.