LOCAL FREIGHT DRIVERS, LOCAL 208, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA
v.
ROZAY'S TRANSFER
LOCAL FREIGHT DRIVERS, LOCAL 208, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA
ROZAY'S TRANSFER
490 U.S. 1030
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Caution
Cited by 30 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (U.S. 1994)…le-member districts, we have embarked upon what has been aptly characterized as a process of “creating racially ‘safe boroughs.’” United States v. Dallas County Comm’n, 850 F. 2d 1433, 1444 (CA11 1988) (Hill, J., concurring specially), cert. denied, 490 U. S. 1030 (1989). We have involved the federal courts, and indeed the Nation, in the enterprise of systematically dividing the country into electoral districts along racial lines — an enterprise of segregating the races into political homelands that amounts…1 / 2
-
Nipper v. Smith, 39 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)…voting.” United States v. Marengo County Comm’n, 731 F. 2d 1546, 1567 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 976, 105 S.Ct. 375, 83 L.Ed.2d 311 (1984); see also United States v. Dallas County Comm’n, 850 F. 2d 1430, 1439 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1030, 109 S.Ct. 1768, 104 L.Ed.2d 203 (1989). The standard we articulate today simply allows a defendant to rebut proof of vote dilution by showing that losses by minority-preferred candidates are attributable to non-racial causes. D. As should be obv…
-
Meek v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 985 F.2d 1471 (11th Cir. 1993)…at 524, 67 S.Ct. at 1389-90. See also Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in Action, 480 U.S. 370, 374-76, 107 S.Ct. 1177, 1181-82, 94 L.Ed.2d 389 (1987); United States v. Dallas County Comm’n, 850 F. 2d 1433, 1442-43 (11th Cir.1988); cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1030, 109 S.Ct. 1768, 104 L.Ed.2d 203 (1989). Even though the district court’s September 11, 1992 injunction order is appealable by the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), we would have no jurisdiction to review it in the absence of our conclusion th…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence