HOBEAU FARM, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MONROE ROAD COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE
HOBEAU FARM, INC., APPELLANT,
MONROE ROAD COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE
223 So. 2d 62
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
There appearing to have been sufficient competent evidence before the jury to support the verdict, this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury, even though had we been jurors we may have reached a different conclusion. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tillie W. LEE v. Dade Cnty., 342 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…an appellate court will not disturb the result. Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). This is true even though the court, sitting as jurors, might have reached a different conclusion. Hobeau Farm, Inc. v. Monroe Road Company, Inc., 223 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). Resolving all conflicts in the evidence in appellee’s favor and taking all inferences fairly deducible therefrom, in the light most favorable to appellee, we must affirm the judgment based on the jury’s verdict. Prince Michael…
-
Boswell v. Russell, 819 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…t livestock are present on a public road does not support an inference that the owner intentionally, willfully, carelessly, or negligently permitted them to be there. Instead, such knowledge or negligence must be established. See Beaver v. Howerton, 223 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Welch v. Baker, 184 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). Under Florida law, neither the liability nor the knowledge of one spouse can generally be imputed to the other. In Schryburt v. Olesen, 475 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), the S…