JONES

v.

PREUIT & MAULDIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Butler v. McKELLAR, 494 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1990)
  …conducted in strict accordance with established law at the time. The panel, therefore, denied Butler’s petition for rehearing. A majority of the Circuit Judges denied, over a dissent, Butler’s petition for a rehearing en banc. We granted certiorari, 490 U. S. 1045 (1989), and now affirm. Last Term in Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302 (1989), we held that in both capital and noncapital cases, “new rules will not be applied or announced in cases on collateral review unless they fall into one of two exceptions.”…
• Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1990)
  …t to petitioners’ jurisdictional challenge, the Court of Appeals found complete diversity, reasoning that Arkoma’s citizenship should be determined by reference to the citizenship of the general, but not the limited, partners. We granted certiorari. 490 U. S. 1045 (1989). II Article III of the Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he judicial Power shall extend to . . . Controversies . . . between Citizens of different States.” Congress first authorized the federal courts to exercise diversity…
• Austin v. Mich. State Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1990)
  …th Amendments. The District Court upheld the statute. 643 F. Supp. 397 (WD Mich. 1986). The Sixth Circuit reversed, reasoning that the expenditure restriction, as applied to the Chamber, violated the First Amendment. We noted probable jurisdiction, 490 U. S. 1045 (1989), and now reverse. [*657] II To determine whether Michigan’s restriction on corporate political expenditures may constitutionally be applied to the Chamber, we must ascertain whether it burdens the exercise of political speech and, if it does…