DORTCH
v.
COHN, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE REFORMATORY, ET AL.
DORTCH
COHN, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE REFORMATORY, ET AL.
490 U.S. 1049
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Filippi, 918 F.2d 244 (1st Cir. 1990)…488, 494 n. 4 (1st Cir.1988) (“A prosecutor does not represent an entity whose interests include ‘winning’ at all costs. Instead, his client is society, seeking justice rather than victory.”), cert. denied sub nom., Crespo-Herrera v. United States, 490 U.S. 1049, 109 S.Ct. 1961, 104 L.Ed.2d 430 and Andrades-Salinas v. United States, 490 U.S. 1049, 109 S.Ct. 1961, 104 L.Ed.2d 430 (1989). Nevertheless, we conclude that Filippi waived his constitutional right when he decided to proceed at trial without his wit…1 / 2
-
United States v. Brown, 938 F.2d 1482 (1st Cir. 1991)…revious cases in which the error was found to be harmless. See United States v. Doe, 860 F. 2d 488, 492 (1st Cir.1988) (prosecutor improperly referred to defendants as “four innocent bastards”), cert, denied sub nom. Crespo-Herrera v. United States, 490 U.S. 1049, 109 S.Ct. 1961, 104 L.Ed.2d 430 (1989), and cert. denied sub nom. Andrades-Salinas v. United States, 490 U.S. 1049, 109 S.Ct. 1961, 104 L.Ed.2d 430 (1989); Cox, 752 F. 2d at 745 (prosecutor improperly referred to defendants’ failure to testify); Un…1 / 2