SPARKS
v.
ARMSTRONG RUBBER CO.
SPARKS
ARMSTRONG RUBBER CO.
490 U.S. 1081
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bolden v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth., 953 F.2d 807 (3d Cir. 1991)…8 F. 2d 1499 (11th Cir.1990); Feeney v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 873 F. 2d 628 (2d Cir.1989), aff'd, 495 U.S. 299, 110 S.Ct. 1868, 109 L.Ed.2d 264 (1990); Mitchell v. Los Angeles Community College Dist., 861 F. 2d 198 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1081, 109 S.Ct. 2102, 104 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988); Meade v. Grubbs, 841 F. 2d 1512 (10th Cir.1988); Morris v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 781 F. 2d 218 (D.C.Cir.1986); Foremost Guar. Corp. v. Community Sav. & Loan, Inc., 826 F. 2d 1383 (4th Cir.1987…
-
King v. Hoover Grp., Inc., 958 F.2d 219 (8th Cir. 1992)…t to include (Carter v. Money Tree, 532 F. 2d 113 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 925, 96 S.Ct. 2636, 49 L.Ed.2d 380 (1976)); and 3) escalated costs unnecessarily and vexatiously (Lupo v. Rowland & Co., 857 F. 2d 482 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1081, 109 S.Ct. 2101, 104 L.Ed.2d 662 (1989)). The district court denied sanctions on the basis that its earlier unpublished opinion in Langemeier provided a reasonable basis for King’s counsel to assert that his cause of action was grounded on state la…