KLEPAK

v.

DOLE, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1996)
  …987); De Abadia v. Izquierdo Mora, 792 F. 2d 1187, 1188-1190 (CA1 1986); Tubbesing v. Arnold, 742 F. 2d 401, 403-404 (CA8 1984). Only the Third Circuit holds otherwise. See Prisco v. United States Dept. of Justice, 851 F. 2d 93, 95-96, cert. denied, 490 U. S. 1089 (1989).…
• Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455 (U.S. 1990)
  …43).” 865 F. 2d, at 600 (citations omitted). To resolve a conflict among the federal appellate courts and state supreme courts,1 we granted certiorari limited to the question whether state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil RICO claims. 490 U. S. 1089 (1989). We hold that they do and accordingly affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. II We begin with the axiom that, under our federal system, the States possess sovereignty concurrent with that of the Federal Government, subject only to lim…
• Winston v. Child. & Youth Servs. OF Del. Cnty., 948 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …. 745, 753, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 1394-95, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982) (citing cases); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212-13, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Prisco v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 851 F. 2d 93, 97 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1089, 109 S.Ct. 2428, 104 L.Ed.2d 985 (1989). In this case, however, there is no challenge to the state’s assumption of custody over Samuel Jr. Instead, we have what counsel characterized at oral argument as a facial challenge to the CYS policy and DPW…