FRANK, AKA ROY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Ombey Mobley, 956 F.2d 450 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …rity. Id., see also United States v. Frank, 864 F. 2d 992 (3d Cir.1988) (sentencing scheme which emphasizes generally acceptable retributive and deterrent purposes is not so fundamentally unfair as to warrant due process condemnation), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1095, 109 S.Ct. 2442, 104 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989); United States v. Brady, 895 F. 2d 538 (9th Cir.1990) (the Sentencing Guidelines do not infringe an individual’s right to due process in sentencing; the legislature is empowered to determine both the factors a…
• United States v. Harrington, 947 F.2d 956 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
  …ative of right to individualized sentencing), overruled by United States v. Brady, 895 F. 2d 538 (9th Cir.1990); [*970] United States v. Frank, 682 F.Supp. 815, 817-19 (W.D.Pa.) (Ziegler, J.) (same), rev’d, 864 F. 2d 992 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1095, 109 S.Ct. 2442, 104 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989). See also: Judioial Conference of the United States, Report of the Federal Courts Study Committee 133-40 (1990) (recommending repeal of mandatory minimum sentencing statutes and substantial reform of Guidelin…
• United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …and caretaking motives will not invalidate the seizure. Cf., e.g., United States v. Frank, 864 F. 2d 992, 1001 (3d Cir.1988) (that inventory search serves investigatory as well as administrative purpose does not invalidate the search), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1095, 109 S.Ct. 2442, 104 L.Ed.2d 998 (1989); United States v. Orozco, 715 F. 2d 158, 161 (5th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (same). Here, the district court did not find that the impoundment was pretex-tual, and we, as an appellate tribunal, are in no position…