HENDERSON

v.

BATTLE CREEK MEDICAL EDUCATION CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cornman v. Armontrout, 959 F.2d 727 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …iled the initial habeas petition pro se. See id. (same); Vasquez v. Lockhart, 867 F. 2d 1056, 1058 (8th Cir.1988) (pro se status and lack of familiarity with American court system are not sufficient cause to excuse procedural default), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1100, 109 S.Ct. 2453, 104 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1989); Smittie v. Lockhart, 843 F. 2d 295, 298 (8th Cir.1988) (pro se status and limited educational background do not constitute cause excusing procedural default). After reviewing Cornman’s allegations of cause,…
• McKINNON v. A.L. Lockhart, 921 F.2d 830 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …1058 (8th Cir.1988) (holding that petitioner’s pro se status and lack of familiarity with the English language did not constitute "cause” for failure to raise ineffectiveness of appellate counsel argument in post-conviction petition), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1100, 109 S.Ct. 2453, 104 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1989). . After reviewing the record, we are satisfied that there was not a constitutional violation in this case resulting in "the conviction of one who is actually innocent.” Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 496,…
• Stanley v. A.L. Lockhart, 941 F.2d 707 (8th Cir. 1991)
  …und do not constitute sufficient cause to excuse his procedural default. Smittie v. Lockhart, 848 F. 2d 295 (8th Cir.1988). See also Ellis v. Lockhart, 875 F. 2d 200 (8th Cir.1989); Vasquez v. Lockhart, 867 F. 2d 1056 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1100, 109 S.Ct. 2453, 104 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1989); Hughes v. Idaho State Bd. of Corrections, 800 F. 2d 905 (9th Cir.1986); Alexander v. Dugger, 841 F. 2d 371 (11th Cir.1988). A federal habeas court may grant the writ despite the failure of the petitioner to…