HORTON MILES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1969-06-10
No. L-42
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
223 So. 2d 383 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thornber v. City OF Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …e for an attorney to attempt to bring such matters before the court. Altchiler v. State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Professions, Board of Dentistry, 442 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Mann v. State Road Department, 223 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). It is the lower tribunal that is the court of record. As such, its judgments or decrees are to be supported, as well as tested by what its record in a particular case may show. Atlas Land Corp. v. Norman, 116 Fla. 800, 156 So. 8…
  • Altchiler v. State, 442 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …iernan, 147 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1962). That an appellate court may not consider matters outside the record is so elemental that there is no excuse for any attorney to attempt to bring such matters before the court. See Mann v. State Road Dept., 223 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). However, our major concern is not counsel’s lack of knowledge of appellate practice and procedure; it is that counsel chose to ignore an order of this court. Although counsel orally asserted to this court that he had not interpr…
  • Dep't OF Transp. v. Majorland, LLC, 135 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …and’s property is not encumbered by either reservation. The trial court correctly determined that the applicability of the right-of-way reservation in the subject deed is controlled by the First District’s decision in Mann v. State Road Department, 223 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). In Mann, the court analyzed the very same reserva [*501] tions of rights in a Murphy Act deed and considered whether the ten-acre-or-more qualifier applied to the right-of-way reservation. Id. at 384. The court concluded that th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw