WORRELL

v.

B. F. GOODRICH CO.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Frank Church, 955 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …s narrowly circumscribed. ‘Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy which should be used only sparingly since it permits the trial court to exclude concededly probative evidence.’ ” United States v. Norton, 867 F. 2d 1354, 1361 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907, 109 S.Ct. 3192, 105 L.Ed.2d 701 (1989). Although certainly prejudicial, evidence of the Cam murder conspiracy was not unfairly prejudicial. Any risk that the jury would have been tempted to punish Coppola for the Cam murder conspiracy is outweigh…
• Harris v. Chapman, 97 F.3d 499 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …this testimony “severely prejudiced” the presentation of his Eighth Amendment claims to the jury. We review the district court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion. United States v. Norton, 867 F. 2d 1354, 1362 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907, 109 S.Ct. 3192, 105 L.Ed.2d 701 (1989). Harris claimed that his lower back was injured during his forced haircut. In an attempt to discredit this assertion, defendants presented medical records that showed that defendant had complained of lower b…
• United States v. LeQUIRE, 943 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …is dispositive of this argument. In Costello, the Court held that inadequate evidence before a grand jury could not be the basis for challenging an indictment. Id.; see also United States v. Norton, 867 F. 2d 1354, 1358 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907, 109 S.Ct. 3192, 105 L.Ed.2d 701 (1989). Thus, Ward’s claim must fail. . The trial judge decided that the vault, allegedly used to store money for the enterprise, should be suppressed as evidence against James LeQuire due to the illegal search in…