THE CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS, A MUNICIPALITY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT G. MAXWELL, ANDREW B. PLASSEY, SAM SOLOVEY, WALTER A. STADNIK, JOHN STADNIK, JOSEPH GOLDBERG, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1969-05-20
No. 68-1096
Before PEARSON and SWANN, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge.
223 So. 2d 387 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of City of Ft. Myers v. State, 95 Fla. 704, 117 So. 97, 104 (1928); Snell Isle Homes, Inc. v. City of St. Petersburg, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 525, 527.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hoffkins v. The City OF Miami, 339 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …aid Municipal Ordinance expresses the same intent as former Florida Statute § 440.09(4). Further, § 440.09(4), now repealed was valid and legal under Pur-dy v. Covert, Fla.App. (2nd) 1963, 151 So. 2d 891; City of Miami v. Clark, Fla.App. (3rd) 1969, 223 So. 2d 387, and City of Miami v. Graham, Fla.1962, 138 So. 2d 751. Although said statute has now been repealed, no new legislation has prohibited the action that was allowed thereunder. Thus the action allowed under F.S. § 440.09(4) is still permissible under…
  • City of Miami Springs v. Maxwell, 226 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1969)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So. 2d 387.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw