MOORE
v.
CALIFORNIA
MOORE
CALIFORNIA
492 U.S. 916
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ohio v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod. Health, 497 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1990)…nd the physician’s personal obligation to give notice to one of the minor’s [*510] parents. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Slaby, 854 F. 2d 852 (1988). The State of Ohio, on appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(2) (1982 ed.), prob. juris, noted, 492 U. S. 916 (1989), challenges the Court of Appeals’ decision in its entirety. Appellees seek affirmance on the grounds adopted by the Court of Appeals and on other grounds. II We have decided five cases addressing the constitutionality of parental notice or…
-
Richard M. Ragsdale, M.D. v. Turnock, 941 F.2d 501 (7th Cir. 1991)…of Appeal, seeking review by the United States Supreme Court. On July 3, 1989, the Supreme Court entered an order accepting the case for oral argument but postponing the question of jurisdiction until the hearing on the merits. Turnock v. Ragsdale, 492 U.S. 916, 109 S.Ct. 3239, 106 L.Ed.2d 587 (1989). Oral argument was scheduled for December 5,1989, but on November 22, 1989, the parties filed a joint motion to defer further proceedings in the Supreme Court pending submission of the proposed Consent Decree…