BARRETT
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BARRETT
UNITED STATES ET AL.
492 U.S. 926
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1992)…11 F. 2d 1264 (1987), with United States v. Barrett, 837 F. 2d 1341 (CA5 1988) (en banc) (district court lacks authority to “conditionally enforce” IRS summons; inquiry limited to single question of whether summons should be enforced), cert. denied, 492 U. S. 926 (1989). United States v. Kersting, 891 F. 2d 1407, 1410, n. 8 (CA9 1989), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 812 (1990); Hintze v. IRS, 879 F. 2d 121, 124-125 (CA4 1989); United States v. Church of World Peace, 878 F. 2d 1281 (CA10 1989); United States v. She…
-
Cunningham v. Zant, 928 F.2d 1006 (11th Cir. 1991)…ted that the written charge would be identical to the oral charge. The state argues that the trial court’s oral charge is virtually identical to the charge this Court held constitutional in High v. Kemp, 819 F. 2d 988 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 3264, 109 L.Ed.2d 609 (1989). Moreover, the state contends that once the written instructions are considered there is no reasonable possibility that a juror could have misunderstood the meaning and function of mitigating circumstances.3…
-
High v. Head, 209 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2000)…ir.1987). The United States Supreme Court initially granted High’s petition for a writ of certiorari, see High v. Zant, 487 U.S. 1233, 108 S.Ct. 2896, 101 L.Ed.2d 930 (1988), but later vacated that decision and denied certiorari. See High v. Zant, 492 U.S. 926, 109 S.Ct. 3264, 106 L.Ed.2d 609 (1989). High then filed a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, which was denied and th…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence