MARTIN ET AL.
v.
WILKS ET AL.; PERSONNEL BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, ET AL. V. WILKS ET AL.; ARRINGTON ET AL. V. WILKS ET AL.; SLAUGHTER V. KENTUCKY; JONES, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSOURI TRAINING CENTER FOR MEN AT MOBERLY V. THOMAS; NEWMAN-GREEN, INC. V. ALFONZO-LARRAIN ET AL.; ASHENBAUGH ET AL. V. CRUCIBLE INC. 1975 SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN; HODGE V. KELLY ET AL.; LOMBARDO V. UNITED STATES; ACOSTA V. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PRUESSMAN V. LEWIS ET AL.; FASSLER V. UNITED STATES; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; HOWARD V. SOUTH CAROLINA; WRENN V. BENSON ET AL.; NIXON V. MISSISSIPPI; MEADE-MURPHY V. CITY OF ATLANTA ET AL.; MENARD V. COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA, ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. WALLMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; RUSCITTI V. ESTATE OF RUSCITTI; BARNES V. DUGGER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; MARTIN V. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND ET AL.; O'NEAL V. EU ET AL.; CARTER V. OHIO; MARTIN V. ABRAM D. MELLINGER REAL ESTATE, INC., IN RE MARTIN, MAY V. HACKETT; IRVING, AKA OWENS V. UNITED STATES; BRANHAM V. GRINAGE ET AL.; STENGEL V. UNITED STATES, IN RE HUMPHREY
MARTIN ET AL.
WILKS ET AL.; PERSONNEL BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, ET AL. V. WILKS ET AL.; ARRINGTON ET AL. V. WILKS ET AL.; SLAUGHTER V. KENTUCKY; JONES, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSOURI TRAINING CENTER FOR MEN AT MOBERLY V. THOMAS; NEWMAN-GREEN, INC. V. ALFONZO-LARRAIN ET AL.; ASHENBAUGH ET AL. V. CRUCIBLE INC. 1975 SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN; HODGE V. KELLY ET AL.; LOMBARDO V. UNITED STATES; ACOSTA V. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PRUESSMAN V. LEWIS ET AL.; FASSLER V. UNITED STATES; JACKSON V. UNITED STATES; HOWARD V. SOUTH CAROLINA; WRENN V. BENSON ET AL.; NIXON V. MISSISSIPPI; MEADE-MURPHY V. CITY OF ATLANTA ET AL.; MENARD V. COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA, ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. WALLMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; RUSCITTI V. ESTATE OF RUSCITTI; BARNES V. DUGGER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; MARTIN V. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND ET AL.; O'NEAL V. EU ET AL.; CARTER V. OHIO; MARTIN V. ABRAM D. MELLINGER REAL ESTATE, INC., IN RE MARTIN, MAY V. HACKETT; IRVING, AKA OWENS V. UNITED STATES; BRANHAM V. GRINAGE ET AL.; STENGEL V. UNITED STATES, IN RE HUMPHREY
492 U.S. 932
Supreme Court of the United States (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Richardson, 233 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2000)…ical Center, 293 N.W. 2d 550 (Iowa 1980). Kansas: State v. Hays, 256 Kan. 48, 883 P. 2d 1093 (Kan.1994). Kentucky: Slaughter v. Commonwealth, 744 S.W. 2d 407 (Ky.1987), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1113, 109 S.Ct. 3174, 104 L.Ed.2d 1036, reh'g denied, 492 U.S. 932, 110 S.Ct. 11, 106 L.Ed.2d 626 (1989); Big Sandy & Cumberland Ry. v. Thacker, 270 Ky. 404, 109 S.W. 2d 820 (Ky.1937). Massachusetts: Commonwealth v. Urena, 417 Mass. 692, 632 N.E. 2d 1200 (Mass. 1994). Michigan: People v. Heard, 388 Mich. 182, 2…