MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR AN INDEPENDENT PRESS ET AL.

v.

THORNBURGH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. W. Elec. Co., 900 F.2d 283 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  …lative or quasi-judicial) that has independent legal significance — as opposed to when they act in a prosecutorial role. See Michigan Citizens for an Indep. Press v. Thornburgh, 868 F. 2d 1285 (D.C.Cir.), aff'd by an equally divided Court, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 398, 107 L.Ed.2d 277 (1989). Still it must not be forgotten that the Justice Department has the “principal responsibility for enforcing the Sherman Act.” Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys., Inc., 441 U.S. 1, 14, 99 S.Ct. 1551, 1559, 6…
• United States v. Navajo Nation, 537 U.S. 488 (U.S. 2003)
  …lding Attorney General’s approval, over the contrary conclusions of an administrative law judge and the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, of a joint operating agreement under the Newspaper Preservation Act), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 493 U. S. 38 (1989) (per curiam). Accordingly [*514], rejection of Peabody’s appeal by the Deputy Assistant Secretary would not necessarily have yielded a higher royalty for the Tribe. * * * However one might appraise the Secretary’s intervention in this case…
• Cent. States Motor Freight Bureau, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 924 F.2d 1099 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
  …s, tells us that Congress does have a specific intent to authorize certain actions but not other actions not specified, see Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh, 868 F. 2d 1285, 1293 (D.C.Cir.), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 493 U.S. 38, 110 S.Ct. 398, 107 L.Ed.2d 277 (1989). Subsection (f) did not say to the ICC “go and deregulate to your heart’s content,” it did not say “deregulate any and all motor carriage,” and it did not say “deregulate motor carriage used to transport cont…