TYLER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• The Read Corp. & F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
  …417-18, 8 USPQ2d at 1694-95. On appeal to determine the correctness of the district court’s ruling on JNOV, we reapply the JNOV standard anew. See Newell Cos. v. Ken-ney Mfg. Co., 864 F. 2d 757, 762, 9 USPQ2d 1417, 1421 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 814, 110 S.Ct. 62, 107 L.Ed.2d 30 (1989). B. The ’194 Patent The determination of infringement is a two-step process. First, the language of the claim must be interpreted. Second, the accused device must be compared to the claim language as interprete…
• Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc., 952 F.2d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
  …c). Thus we look to Supreme Court and Third Circuit precedent for explication of the standard of review of jury verdicts, see Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Mfg. Co., 864 F. 2d 757, 761 n. 1, 9 USPQ2d 1417, 1420 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 814, 110 S.Ct. 62, 107 L.Ed.2d 30 (1989), taking note that this standard does not vary significantly among the circuits, see 5A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 50.07[2] (2d ed. 1985), including until today the Federal Circuit. . The panel majority states th…
• Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. O'Keefe, 986 F.2d 486 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
  …herefore, cannot be interpreted as negating the Grumman requirement or creating an alternative one. In any event, the earlier case in time, Grumman, controls. See Newell Cos., Inc. v. Kenney Mfg. Co., 864 F. 2d 757, 765 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 814, 110 S.Ct. 62, 107 L.Ed.2d 30 (1989). In most circumstances, an individual in charge of the plant where the contract is performed will also have primary responsibility for the contract’s execution. Therefore, as a kind of short hand, panels may ha…