STACHE

v.

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTSMEN, AFL-CIO

Citator

Cited By

• Joe Church v. City OF Huntsville, 30 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …rticular issues.’ ” Sims v. Florida Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 862 F. 2d 1449, 1458 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (alteration in original) (quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2204, 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 815, 110 S.Ct. 64, 107 L.Ed.2d 31 (1989). To establish standing, a plaintiff must have “suffered an injury-in-fact that would be corrected by [a] favorable decision in the lawsuit.” Cheffer v. McGregor, 6 F. 3d 705, 708 (11th Cir.1993). Absent a red…
• Deeper Life Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Sobol, 948 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …at the scenario at issue was likely to recur. Id. at 318-22,108 S.Ct. at 601-04. In the present case, we do not have similarly compelling evidence. Appellant also cites R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N.V., 867 F. 2d 102 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 815, 110 S.Ct. 64, 107 L.Ed.2d 31 (1989), for the view that a minimal showing is required to prove “capable of repetition.” However, in R.C. Bigelow, we were dealing with the well-settled rule that voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal conduct does n…
• Anago, Inc. v. Tecnol Med. Prods., Inc., 976 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 834.2b, at 305 (Supp.1988)). This is not the first time that this Circuit’s views on antitrust law have differed from the Second Circuit’s. In R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N.V., 867 F. 2d 102 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 815, 110 S.Ct. 64, 107 L.Ed.2d 31 (1989), the Second Circuit declined to follow Phototron to the extent that it “requires proof of antitrust injury on an application for a preliminary injunction_” Id. at 109. Thus, the Second Circuit generally takes a l…