CITY OF EVERETT, MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.

v.

BORDANARO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Haynes v. W.C. Caye & Co., Inc., 52 F.3d 928 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ss obvious than the one at bar. For example, the requirements of Rule 39 have been interpreted to " 'encompass orders entered by the court and not objected to.’ ” Sewell v. Jefferson Co. Fiscal Court, 863 F. 2d 461, 464 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 820, 110 S.Ct. 75, 107 L.Ed.2d 42 (1989) (citation omitted). In addition, failure to object to a nonjury factfinding proceeding might waive a valid jury demand as to any claims decided in that proceeding, "at least where it was clear that the court int…
• Foley v. City OF Lowell, 948 F.2d 10 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …this custom or policy was the cause of, and moving force behind, the particular constitutional deprivation of which he was complaining. See Bordanaro v. McLeod, 871 F. 2d 1151, 1156 (1st Cir.) (collecting relevant Supreme Court cases), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 820, 110 S.Ct. 75, 107 L.Ed.2d 42 (1989). Contrary to the City’s exhortation that the date an incident occurs marks the outside date for evidence-gathering on such an issue, we think that actions taken subsequent to an event are admissible if, and to…
• Willhauck v. Halpin, 953 F.2d 689 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …e municipal supervision of police conduct, and 2) that the nighttime intrusion indicated the existence of an unconstitutional municipal custom of nighttime service of arrest warrants. Cf. Bordanaro v. McLeod, 871 F. 2d 1151 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 820, 110 S.Ct. 75, 107 L.Ed.2d 42 (1989) (outlining standards for proof theories of inadequate municipal training or supervision and unconstitutional municipal custom). We would review Willhauck’s factual averments as true and construe them in the lig…

  ← 1 / 2 →