GULF STREAM MOTORS, INC. AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CHRISTINA COOK AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONER
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date March 6, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions are therefore denied.
The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (153 total)
-
Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. McCARSON, 467 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1985)…sarial relationship between the insured and the injured party and the insurance company’s status as the real party in interest from whom the injured party would be collecting for his damages once liability was proven. See e.g., Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla.1969). Liability insurance provides indemnity against liability. In the usual liability policy, the insuror is bound to pay damages for bodily injury or property damage for which any covered person becomes legally liable, up to the applicable p…
-
Ara Williams VanBIBBER v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Ins. Co., 439 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1983)…the Florida Constitution of 1885; unconstitutionally denies due process, and unconstitutionally denies or delays the right of access to the courts under sections 9 and 21, respectively, article I, Florida Constitution of 1968. Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969), overruled Artille v. Davidson, 126 Fla. 219, 170 So. 707 (1936), by holding that an injured plaintiff had a direct cause of action against a motor vehicle liability insurer which accrued concurrently with the right of action against the…1 / 3
-
Nolan Hurt and Florence Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co., 380 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 1980)…r argues that the use of such general release clauses originated to protect those persons in privity with the named parties. See Albert’s Shoes v. Crabtree Construction Co., 89 So. 2d 491 (Fla.1956). This was necessary prior to Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla.1969), which authorized the joinder of insurance companies. Under this theory, the all-inclusive language was routinely included in printed releases as “boilerplate”, and may not reflect [*434] the intent of the parties. See Quarterman v. City…
Previewing 3 of 153 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence