KELLY
v.
HINES-RINALDI FUNERAL HOME, INC.

U.S. | 1989-10-02
No. 88-7418
493 U.S. 835 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. Ohio Tpk. Comm'n, 968 F.2d 606 (6th Cir. 1992)
    …premises. See, e.g., Kelly v. Hines-Rinaldi Funeral Home, 847 F. 2d 147, 148 (4th Cir.1988) (affirming summary judgment against housekeeper's claim for compensation for nights primarily spent sleeping in apartment inside funeral home), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 835, 110 S.Ct. 112, 107 L.Ed.2d 74 (1989); Rousseau v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc., 805 F. 2d 1245, 1248-49 (5th Cir.1986) (affirming dismissal of offshore oil workers’ claim for compensation for time primarily spent sleeping and relaxing on employe…
  • Krim v. Banctexas Grp., Inc., 989 F.2d 1435 (5th Cir. 1993)
    …claim of fraud”); Baum v. Phillips, Appel & Walden, Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1518, 1526 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (merely being induced to retain securities does not constitute violation of Rule 10b-5), aff’d, Asch v. Phillips, 867 F. 2d 776 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 835, 110 S.Ct. 114, 107 L.Ed.2d 75 (1989); Sacks v. Reynolds Sec., Inc., 593 F. 2d 1234, 1241 (D.C.Cir.1978) (Blue Chip Stamps does not permit recovery under Rule 10b-5 when alleged fraud causes an investor to retain ownership in securities); Goldman v.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw