PENDLETON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Terance Valentine v. State, 688 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1996)
  …between them should not be admissible as any other evidence. See United States v. Treff, 924 F. 2d 975 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 958, 111 S.Ct. 2272, 114 L.Ed.2d 723 (1991); United States v. Frank, 869 F. 2d 1177 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 839, 110 S.Ct. 121, 107 L.Ed.2d 82 (1989); United States v. Fulk, 816 F. 2d 1202 (7th Cir.1987); In re Witness Before Grand Jury, 791 F. 2d 234 (2d Cir.1986); People v. Mohammed, 122 Misc.2d 504, 470 N.Y.S.2d 997 (1984). OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur.…
• United States v. Davis, 967 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …er the area; or (b) a substantial interest in the area; or (c) permission to gain access. United States v. Gradowski, 502 F. 2d 563, 564 (2d Cir.1974) (per curiam); see also United States v. Trzaska, 859 F. 2d 1118, 1120 (2d Cir.1988), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 839, 110 S.Ct. 123, 107 L.Ed.2d 84 (1989). We conclude that Cleare had sufficient authority to give valid consent to the search of the trunk. With respect to the first prong, it is obvious that Cleare had “access” to the trunk — he lived in the apartme…
• United States v. Porter, 986 F.2d 1014 (6th Cir. 1993)
  …e been legally divorced. In Re Witness Before Grand Jury, 791 F. 2d 234, 238-39 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Fulk, 816 F. 2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir.1987); Byrd, 750 F. 2d at 593; United States v. Frank, 869 F. 2d 1177, 1179 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 839, 110 S.Ct. 121, 107 L.Ed.2d 82 (1989); United States v. Roberson, 859 F. 2d 1376, 1381 (9th Cir.1988). The justification for the exception is the result of balancing the need for protecting spousal communications against the importance of the searc…