RIVERA DE FELICIANO ET AL.

v.

FARM CREDIT CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Governor John Ellis "Jeb" Bush v. Holmes, 886 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …rt reasoned that “applying] federal establishment clause analysis ... would be inappropriate.” Id. The United States Supreme Court subsequently denied Mr. Witters’ petition for writ of certiorari. Witters v. Washington Dep’t of Servs. for the Blind, 493 U.S. 850, 110 S.Ct. 147, 107 L.Ed.2d 106 (1989). In its recent opinion in Locke, the Supreme Court has again addressed the same Washington constitutional provision that it considered in Witters. As discussed in detail in section VII infra, the Court recogni…
• Hess v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 513 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1994)
  …53 F. 2d 807, 818 (CA3 1991) (in banc) (“[T]he ‘most important’ factor is ‘whether any judgment would be paid from the state treasury.’”) (quoting Fitchik v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., 873 F. 2d 655, 659 (CA3) (in banc), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 850 (1989)), cert. denied, 504 U. S. 943 (1992); Barket [*49], Levy & Fine, Inc. v. St. Louis Thermal Energy Corp., 948 F. 2d 1084, 1087 (CA8 1991) (“Because Missouri and Illinois are not liable for judgments against Bi-State, there is no policy reason…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bolden v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth., 953 F.2d 807 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …considered the Eleventh Amendment’s application to a variety of governmental and semi-governmental entities. Just two and a half years ago, sitting in banc in Fitchik v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, 873 F. 2d 655 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 850, 110 S.Ct. 148, 107 L.Ed.2d 107 (1989), we held that the Eleventh Amendment did not apply to the agency created by the State of New Jersey to provide public transportation following the demise or decline of many of the privately owned railroads and…

  ← 1 / 2 →