SPEERS

v.

CONNECTICUT

Citator

Cited By

• In re Bryson Props. v. Bryson Props., 961 F.2d 496 (4th Cir. 1992)
  …tandard (Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8013; Willemain v. Kivitz, 764 F. 2d 1019, 1022 (4th Cir.1985)); its conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Quinn Wholesale, Inc. v. Northern, 100 B.R. 271, 273, (M.D.N.C.1988), aff'd, 873 F. 2d 77 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851, 110 S.Ct. 151, 107 L.Ed.2d 109 (1989). [*500] DISCUSSION 1. Secured Claim Travelers argues the Plan is not fair and equitable because Travelers does not receive the present value of its secured claim. Before a reorganization plan is confirmed, i…
• Price v. Austin Indep. Sch. Dist., 945 F.2d 1307 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …n appellate court establishing] the ‘law of the case’ and must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the same case at both the trial and appellate levels.... ” Schex-nider v. McDermott Int’l, Inc., 868 F. 2d 717, 718 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851, 110 S.Ct. 150, 107 L.Ed.2d 108 (1989); see also Pegues v. Morehouse Parish School Board, 706 F. 2d 735, 738 (5th Cir.1983); White v. Murtha, 377 F. 2d 428, 431-32 (5th Cir.1967). Overton’s pronouncement binds our consideration of this issue on this…