AINSWORTH
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1989-10-02
No. 88-5964
493 U.S. 884 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Storey v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 949 F.2d 1039 (8th Cir. 1991)
    …C” and did not remove the Storeys’ federal securities claims from the ambit of the arbitration clause. In support of its position, Shearson cites Bird v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc., 871 F. 2d 292, 295 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 493 U.S. 884, 110 S.Ct. 225, 107 L.Ed.2d 177 (1989), wherein the Second Circuit construed an arbitration clause identical to the clause at issue in the present case to require arbitration of a § 10(b) claim. See Clark v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, In…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw