HORTON

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1990)
  …ons for second-degree burglary to enhance his sentence. 864 F. 2d 625, 627 (1989). The majority relied on their court’s earlier decision in United States v. Portwood, 857 F. 2d 1221 (1988), cert. denied, 490 U. S. 1069 (1989). We granted certiorari, 493 U. S. 889 (1989), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of [*580] Appeals concerning the definition of burglary for purposes of § 924(e).2 The word “burglary” has not been given a single accepted meaning by the state courts; the criminal codes of the States…
• Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1990)
  …Court denied petitioner’s request for review. App. 78. [*132] Because the California courts’ interpretation of the “plain-view” doctrine conflicts with the view of other courts,3 and because the unresolved issue is important, we granted certiorari, 493 U. S. 889 (1989). [*133] II The Fourth Amendment provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable…
• Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764 (U.S. 1990)
  …[was] doing little more than second-guessing the Arizona Supreme Court’s interpretation of facts that quite reasonably fit within the statutory definition of aggravating circumstances.” 832 F. 2d, at 487. We granted certiorari, Ricketts v. Jeffers, 493 U. S. 889 (1989), and now reverse. II Petitioners contend that this case presents the question whether a federal court may make a de novo review of the evidence supporting a state court’s finding of a facially con [*774] stitutional aggravating circumstance…