MANIFOLD ET AL.
v.
BLUNT, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI

U.S. | 1989-10-10
No. 89-310
493 U.S. 893 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fulani v. Krivanek, 973 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1992)
    …ver, equal protection challenges to state ballot-access laws are considered under the Anderson test. See Bergland v. Harris, 767 F. 2d 1551, 1552 (11th Cir.1985). Compare Manifold v. Blunt, 863 F. 2d 1368, 1373 & n. 9 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 893, 110 S.Ct. 242, 107 L.Ed.2d 192 (1989) (applying strict scrutiny and rejecting Anderson test); Dixon v. Maryland St. Admin. Bd. of Election Laws, 878 F. 2d 776, 778-80 (4th Cir.1989) (noting possible distinction between challenges based on the Equa…
  • Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. Ferdinand Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1992)
    …d the limits of substantive due process in regulating the plaintiff’s use of his property by denying the application arbitrarily and capriciously.” RRI Realty Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Southhampton, 870 F. 2d 911, 917 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 893, 110 S.Ct. 240, 107 L.Ed.2d 191 (1989); see also Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. Johnson, 758 F. 2d 54, 60 (2d Cir.1985) (Because zoning board, even if acting lawfully, was not required to grant zoning approval, plaintiffs “lack any property interest prote…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw