TYLER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Dunnigan, 944 F.2d 178 (4th Cir. 1991)
  …wn behalf is not a license to commit perjury. United States v. Batista-Polanco, 927 F. 2d 14, 22 (1st Cir.1991); United States v. Matos, 907 F. 2d 274, 276 (2nd Cir.1990); United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F. 2d 945, 953 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899, 110 S.Ct. 255, 107 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989); United States v. O’Meara, 895 F. 2d 1216 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 352, 112 L.Ed.2d 316 (1990); United States v. Barbosa, 906 F. 2d 1366, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct.…
• United States v. Carter, 953 F.2d 1449 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …‘must be so pronounced and persistent that it permeates the entire atmosphere of the trial.’ ” (quoting United States v. Blevins, 555 F. 2d 1236, 1240 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016, 98 S.Ct. 733, 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978))), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899, 110 S.Ct. 256, 107 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989). In making that determination, the Court is to consider: (1) the magnitude of the prejudicial effect of the statements; (2) the efficacy of any cautionary instructions; and (3) the strength of the evidence of…
• United States v. Robert B. French (90-6222), 974 F.2d 687 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …he purposes enumerated in the rule, then the court must also consider whether the probative value is outweighed by the prejudicial effect under Fed.R.Evid. 403. United States v. [*695] Acosta-Cazares, 878 F. 2d 945, 948-949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899, 110 S.Ct. 255, 107 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989). The government may use evidence of similar acts that are probative of intent if specific intent is an element of the crime charged, such as the conspiracy in this case. See United States v. Pollard, 778 F. 2d…