CASIANO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Billy Joe Chambers (89-1381), 944 F.2d 1253 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …o held that “the statute does not require actual physical possession of a weapon or that the defendant actually brandished the weapon in the commission of a drug offense.” United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F. 2d 945, 952 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899, 110 S.Ct. 255, 107 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989). We noted that “ ‘uses’ and ‘carries’ should be construed broadly to cover the gamut of situations where drug traffickers have ready access to weapons with which they secure or enforce their transactions.” Id.…
• United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …hat have considered whether the enhancement impinges on the right to testify agree that it does not. See United States v. Batista-Polanco, 927 F. 2d 14, 22 (1st Cir.1991); United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F. 2d 945, 953 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899, HO S.Ct. 255, 107 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989); United States v. Barbosa, 906 F. 2d 1366, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 394, 112 L.Ed.2d 403 (1990); United States v. Keys, 899 F. 2d 983, 988 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1…