GONZALEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Arave v. Creech, 507 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1993)
  …n, 116 Idaho 82, 99, 774 P. 2d 252, 269 (“[T]he ‘utter disregard’ factor refers not to the outrageousness of the acts constituting the murder, but to the defendant’s lack of conscientious scruples against killing another human being”), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 917 (1989). In light of the consistent narrowing definition given the “utter disregard” circumstance by the Idaho Supreme Court, we are satisfied that the circumstance, on its face, meets constitutional standards. HH > — ( Creech argues alternatively…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Brooks v. Ga. State Bd. OF Elections, 59 F.3d 1114 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …d escape the jurisdictional bar of mootness. See Gilpin v. American Fed’n of State, County, and Mun. Employees, AFL-CIO, 875 F. 2d 1310, 1313 (7th Cir.) (“Even the United States Court of Appeals ... cannot make time run backwards.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 917, 110 S.Ct. 278, 107 L.Ed.2d 258 (1989). Moreover, even if we had the power to modify the dates in the agreement as Plaintiffs suggest, we conclude that it would be inappropriate to impose a settlement that has expired by its own terms on parties no…
• Charles Greiner & Co., Inc. v. Mari-Med MFG., Inc., 962 F.2d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
  …n Cyanamid Co., 774 F. 2d 448, 452, 227 USPQ 293, 295 (Fed.Cir.1985). To infringe, an accused device must embody exactly each claim limitation or its equivalent. Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F. 2d 1569, 1571, 9 USPQ2d 1552, 1553 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 917, 110 S.Ct. 276, 107 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989). Unfair competition and trademark infringement, like patent infringement, in [*1035] volve questions of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Keds Corp. v. Renee Int’l Trading, 888 F. 2d 215, 222…