TEXAS

v.

NEW MEXICO

Citator

Cited By

• Melvina Lorraine Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 616 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …of privacy by the disclosure of private facts are the following: “1) the publication, 2) of private facts, 3) that are offensive, and 4) are not of public concern.” Cape Publications, Inc. v. Hitchner, 549 So. 2d 1374, 1377 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 493 U.S. 929, 110 S.Ct. 296, 107 L.Ed.2d 276 (1989). The right of privacy does not protect against publication of public records and matters of legitimate public interest. Cox Broadcasting v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S.Ct. 1029, 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975); Cape Publica…
• DOE v. Univision Television Grp., Inc., 717 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …udgment should not have been entered on the invasion of privacy claim. Florida recognizes the tort of invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts. See Cape Publications, Inc. v. Hitchner, 549 So. 2d 1374, 1377 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 493 U.S. 929, 110 S.Ct. 296, 107 L.Ed.2d 276 (1989). As stated there, The Restatement (Second) of Torts defines the tort of invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts (private-facts tort) as follows: Sec. 652D. Publicity Given to Private Life O…
• Fitzpatrick v. City OF Atlanta, 2 F.3d 1112 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …7, 53 L.Ed.2d 786 (1977); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 432, 91 S.Ct. 849, 854, 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971); Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Div., Pullman, Inc., 854 F. 2d 1549, 1580 (11th Cir.1988), vacated sub nom., Pullman-Standard, Inc. v. Swint, 493 U.S. 929, 110 S.Ct. 316, 107 L.Ed.2d 307 (1989). In 1989, the Supreme Court in Wards Cove changed the law, holding that the defendant bore only the burden of coming forward with an alleged business-related justification for the challenged practice which th…