STRIKER BOATS, INC., AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
MACK NUBY, AND FIC, RESPONDENTS
STRIKER BOATS, INC., AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
MACK NUBY, AND FIC, RESPONDENTS
224 So. 2d 272
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 12, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burnsed v. Seaboard Coastline R.R. Co., 290 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1974)…by the revision of Article V effective January 1, 1973, because of the context within which the term “order” is utilized and because of the existence of [*17] “new” Article V, Section 3(b)(3), we must still adhere to our opinion in State v. Kahler, 224 So. 2d 272 (Fla.1969), wherein we stated that the, “ . . . subject ‘Order’ which allegedly passes on the validity of a state statute must necessarily qualify as a final judgment; otherwise, under the Constitution it could not be directly appealable here.” Acc…
-
State v. Kahler, 232 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1970)…habit-forming, toxic, harmful or new drugs. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. It is so ordered. ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur. . 224 So. 2d 272 (Fla.1969). . Fla.Stat. § 500.151(2), F.S.A.: “The possession of a drug under subsection (1) not properly labeled to indicate that possession is by a valid prescription of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug by any person not exe…
-
Eli S. Jenkins v. Hon. Woody A. Lyles, 223 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1969)…THORNAL, J., concurs for reasons herein and in our decision in State v. Kahler, Fla. 224 So. 2d 272, filed May 28, 1969. ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence