ROSS

v.

MIDWEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DBA WCCO TELEVISION, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc., 709 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …t v. Dow Chem. Co., 868 F. 2d 1428, 1433 (5th Cir.1989)(as long as expert’s methodology is well-founded, the nature of his conclusion is generally irrelevant, even if it is controversial or unique), cert. denied sub nom., Dow Chem. Co. v. Greenhill, 493 U.S. 935, 110 S.Ct. 328, 107 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989); Osburn v. Anchor Lab., Inc., 825 F. 2d 908, 915 (5th Cir.1987)(“an expert’s opinion need not be generally accepted in the scientific community before it can be sufficiently reliable and probative in support of…
• State v. Sercey, 825 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …Cir.1993); Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F. 2d 1106 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 912, 112 S.Ct. 1280, 117 L.Ed.2d 506 (1992); Peteet v. Dow Chemical Co., 868 F. 2d 1428 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Dow Chemical Co. v. Greenhill, 493 U.S. 935, 110 S.Ct. 328, 107 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989); Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F. 2d 908 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. v. Osburn, 485 U.S. 1009, 108 S.Ct. 1476, 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988); Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co., 73…
• Stephens v. The C.I.T. Group/Equipment Fin., Inc., 955 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …ailing to raise it in their original brief); Peteet v. Dow Chemical Co., 868 F. 2d 1428, 1437 (5th Cir.) (“We may not review arguments raised for the first time in the appellant’s reply brief.”), cert. denied sub nom., Dow Chemical Co. v. Greenhill, 493 U.S. 935, 110 S.Ct. 328, 107 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989). Additionally, CIT waived the defense of statute of limitations at the trial court level. In fact, aside from urging a general statute of limitations defense in its answer, CIT never mentioned limitations in t…